Main Article Content
Introduction Six sigma has been used over the years, initially in manufacturing industries to improve quality by reducing the number of wastes and defects. In the laboratory, it can also provide measurement of quality using the sigma scale.
Objectives The main objective of the study is to evaluate the performance of tests in two chemistry analyzers using the six sigma scale.
Methodology A total of twenty (28) tests were evaluated on two Abbott Architect c8000 chemistry analyzers from September 2014 to July 2019 using results of quality control mean, coefficient of variation, bias and total allowable error to compute for the six sigma value. Both level one and level two third party quality controls were included in the evaluation.
ResultsOResults of the study showed the tests that were >6 sigma for both levels 1 and 2 throughout the 5 years. Di-Bil, CK, HLD, TG and UA were consistently >6 sigma for one machine while CK, Di-Bil, HDL, Mg, TG and UA were consistently >6 sigma for the other. Level 1 and Level 2 sigma scores were noted to be incongruent in some analytes as follows: ALB, ALT, K, TP for one instrument and ALB, ALP and AST for the other instrument. Electrolytes Ca, Cl, and Na were generally low (
Conclusion Using six sigma metrics allowed the laboratory to evaluate the performance of the chemistry tests objectively. Tests that are >6.0 sigma signifies world class performance and entail application of fewer Westgard rules with fewer number of runs while those that are
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
The Philippine Journal of Pathology is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License. Based on works made open access at http://philippinejournalofpathology.org
2. Westgard JO. Six sigma quality design and control. Madison, WI. Westgard QC, Inc., 2006.
3. Lippi G, Plebani M. A six-sigma approach for comparing diagnostic errors in healthcare- where does laboratory medicine stand? Ann Transl Med. 2018;6(10):180. PMID: 29951502. PMCID: PMC5994534. https://doi.org/10.21037/ atm.2018.04.02.
4. Singh B, Goswami B, Gupta VK, Chawla R, Mallika V. Application of sigma metrics for the assessment of quality assurance in clinical biochemistry laboratory in India: a pilot study. Ind J Clin Biochem. 2011;26(2):131-5. PMID: 22468038. PMCID: PMC3107403.https://doi.org/10.1007/s12291-010-0083-1.
5. Chaudhary NG, Patani SS, Sharma H, Maheshwari A, Jadhav PM, Maniar MA. Application of six sigma for the quality assurance in clinical biochemistry laboratory – a retrospective study. Int J Res Med. 2013:2(3):17-20.
6. Lakshman M, Reddy BR, Bhulaxmi P, et al. Evaluation
of sigma metrics in a Medical Biochemistry lab. Int J Biomed Res. 2015;6(3):164-71. https://doi.org/10.7439/ijbr.
7. Modi N, Shah T. Application of six sigma test in clinical
biochemistry laboratory. Int J Res Med. 2017;6(2):75-8.
8. CLIA Requirements for Analytical Quality. Available
9. Ricós C, Alvarez V, Cava R et.al. Current databases on
biological variation: pros, cons and progress. Scand J Clin Lab Invest. 1999;59(7):491-500. PMID: 10667686.https://doi.org/
10. Friedecky B, Kratochvila J, Budina M. Why do
different EQA schemes have apparently different limits of acceptability? Clin Chem Lab Med. 2011;49:743-5. PMID: 21235390. https://doi.org/10.1515/CCLM.2011.105.
11. Hens, K, Berth M, Armbruster D, Westgard S. Sigma metrics used to assess analytical quality of clinical chemistry assays: importance of the allowable total error (TEa) target. Clin Chem Lab Med 2014;52(7):973-80. PMID: 24615486. https://doi.org/10.1515/cclm-2013-1090.
12. Guo X, Zhang T, Gao X, et al. Sigma metrics for assessing the analytical quality of clinical chemistry assays: a comparison of two approaches: electronic supplementary material available online for this article. Biochem Med (Zagreb).2018;28(2):
020708. PMID: 30022883. PMCID: PMC6039159. https://doi.org/10.11613/BM.2018.020708.