Value of Cell Block Technique as an Adjunct to Smear Cytology in Thyroid Fine-Needle Aspiration Biopsy

Authors

  • Nichole Andrea Bisquera St. Luke's Medical Center Quezon City, Philippines https://orcid.org/0009-0002-9064-8662
  • Oliver Allan Dampil St. Luke's Medical Center, Quezon City, Philippines
  • Bernadette Diane Vista St. Luke's Medical Center, Quezon City, Philippines

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.21141/PJP.2025.02

Keywords:

fine needle biopsy, thyroid nodule, Bethesda I, thyroid gland, thyroid disease, thyroid nodules, non-diagnostic smears, cell block, Bethesda System, thyroid cytopathology

Abstract

Background. Thyroid fine-needle aspiration biopsy (FNAB) is widely used for thyroid nodule characterization, with approximately 2.7% of samples classified as "inadequate." Non-diagnostic samples pose limitations, resulting in repeated procedures, and unnecessary diagnostic thyroidectomies. Conventional smear (CS) is commonly the method of choice for cytologic preparation of thyroid FNAB. The cell block technique is an alternative that concentrates cells providing additional material for better evaluation and ancillary testing. While conventional smears are commonly used, introducing routine complementary cell blocks could potentially lower costs associated with repeat procedures and improve patient management.

Objective. The study aimed to investigate the diagnostic value of incorporating the cell block technique as adjunct to conventional smear technique in reducing nondiagnostic rates (Bethesda Category I) in thyroid-fine needle aspiration biopsies (FNAB) conducted in 2 private hospitals.

Methodology. This is a multi-center, retrospective cross-sectional study with 701 samples from 528 adult patients, who underwent thyroid FNAB between January 2020 - September 2022. The primary outcome of interest is the reduction in non-diagnostic rates with the combined use of conventional smears and cell block.

Results. The non-diagnostic rates were significantly higher with cell block technique (28.10%) as compared to conventional smears (16.26%), p-value <.01. The results show that conventional smears have lower non-diagnostic rates. With smear cytology alone, 114 (16.3%) of all samples were nondiagnostic. With the addition of cell block technique, 15 of these samples were reclassified as benign (n = 13), Bethesda III (n = 1) or Bethesda IV (n = 1). The rest of the non-diagnostic samples (n = 99) remained Bethesda I. Overall, the equivalent decrease in non-diagnostic rate was 2.1%

Conclusion. The combined use of cell block and conventional smears did not significantly decrease nondiagnostic rates in thyroid FNAB. In general, conventional smears demonstrated superior diagnostic efficacy across all Bethesda categories, establishing it as the preferred sampling preparation method for thyroid FNAB. Cell blocks should be considered a supplementary technique, particularly in cases where ancillary methods like immunohistochemistry or molecular testing are needed.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Author Biographies

Nichole Andrea Bisquera, St. Luke's Medical Center Quezon City, Philippines

Section of Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism, St. Luke’s Medical Center, Quezon City, Philippines

Oliver Allan Dampil, St. Luke's Medical Center, Quezon City, Philippines

Consultant, Section of Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism, St. Luke's Medical Center, Quezon City, Philippines

Bernadette Diane Vista, St. Luke's Medical Center, Quezon City, Philippines

Section of Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism, St. Luke’s Medical Center, Quezon City, Philippines

References

Galera-Davidson H, Gonzalez-Campora R. Thyroid in: Bibbo M, Wilbur: Comprehensive cytopathology, 3rd ed, chapter 23. Philadelphia, PA: Saunders Elsevier. 2008. NLM ID: 101487642

Yassa L, Cibas ES, Benson CB, et al. Long-term assessment of a multidisciplinary approach to thyroid nodule diagnostic evaluation. Cancer. 2007;111(6):508-16. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/17999413. https://doi.org/10.1002/cncr.23116 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/cncr.23116

Haugen BR, Alexander EK, Bible KC, et al. 2015 American Thyroid Association Management Guidelines for adult patients with thyroid nodules and differentiated thyroid cancer: the American Thyroid Association Guidelines Task Force on thyroid nodules and differentiated thyroid cancer. Thyroid. 2016; 26(1): 1–133. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/26462967 https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4739132 https://doi.org/10.1089/thy.2015.0020 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1089/thy.2015.0020

Ali SZ, Baloch ZW, Cochand-Priollet B, Schmitt FC, Bielh P, VanderLaan PA. The 2023 Bethesda System for reporting thyroid cytopathology. J Am Soc Cytopathol. 2023;12(5):319-25. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/37438235 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jasc.2023.05.005 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jasc.2023.05.005

Crescenzi A, Baloch Z. Immunohistochemistry in the pathologic diagnosis and management of thyroid neoplasms. Front Endocrinol (Lausanne). 2023;14:1198099. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/37324272 https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10266214 https://doi.org/10.3389/fendo.2023.1198099 DOI: https://doi.org/10.3389/fendo.2023.1198099

Poller D, Glaysher S, Agrawal A, Caldera S, Kim D, Yiangou C. BRAF V600 co-testing in thyroid FNA cytology: short-term experience in a large cancer centre in the UK. J Clin Pathol. 2014;67(8):684-9. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/24873948 https://doi.org/10.1136/jclinpath-2014-202348 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1136/jclinpath-2014-202348

Khan S, Omar T, Michelow P. Effectiveness of the cell block technique in diagnostic cytopathology. J Cytol. 2012;29(3):177-82. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/23112458 https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3480766 https://doi.org/10.4103/0970-9371.101167 DOI: https://doi.org/10.4103/0970-9371.101167

Demirci NY, Dikmen AU, Abdullayeva Z, Öztürk C. Contribution of cell blocks obtained through endobronchial ultrasound-guided transbronchial needle aspiration for the determination of lung cancer subtypes. Clin Respir J. 2018;12(4):1623-7. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/28976111 https://doi.org/10.1111/crj.12719 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/crj.12719

Jiang K, Zhou J, Lei J, et al. Cell block is a valuable adjunct to conventional smear for thyroid fine needle aspiration: 2395 cases with histological correlation. Cytopathology. 2018;29(6). 525-30. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/30238537 https://doi.org/10.1111/cyt.12633 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/cyt.12633

De Cristo AP, Goldstein HF, Faccin CS, Maia AL, Graudenz MS. Increasing diagnostic effectiveness of thyroid nodule evaluation by implementation of cell block preparation in routine US-FNA analysis. Arch Endocrinol Metab. 2016;60(4):367-73. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/27533613 https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10118724 https://doi.org/10.1590/2359-3997000000180 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1590/2359-3997000000180

Sanchez N, Selvaggi SM. Utility of cell blocks in the diagnosis of thyroid aspirates. Diagnostic Cytopathol. 2006;34(2):89-92. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/16514670 https://doi.org/10.1002/dc.20385 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/dc.20385

Saharti S. The diagnostic value of add-on thyroid cell block in the evaluation of thyroid lesions. Cytojournal. 2023;20:3. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/36895260 https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9990845 https://doi.org/10.25259/Cytojournal_9_2022 DOI: https://doi.org/10.25259/Cytojournal_9_2022

Bongiovanni M, Spitale A, Faquin WC, Mazzucchelli L, Baloch ZW. The Bethesda System for reporting thyroid cytopathology: a meta-analysis. Acta Cytologica. 2012;56(4):333-9. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/22846422 https://doi.org/10.1159/000339959 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1159/000339959

Pastorello RG, Destefani C, Pinto PH, et al. The impact of rapid on-site evaluation on thyroid fine-needle aspiration biopsy: a 2-year cancer center institutional experience. Cancer Cytopathology, 2018;126(10). 846–52. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/30317695 https://doi.org/10.1002/cncy.22051 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/cncy.22051

Gursoy A, Anil C, Erismis B, Ayturk S. Fine-needle aspiration biopsy of thyroid nodules: comparison of diagnostic performance of experienced and inexperienced physicians. Endocr Pract. 2010;16(6):986-91. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/20570813 https://doi.org/10.4158/EP10077.OR DOI: https://doi.org/10.4158/EP10077.OR

Houdek D, Cooke Hubley S, Puttagunta L, Morrish D. Factors affecting thyroid nodule fine needle aspiration non‐diagnostic rates: a retrospective association study of 1975 thyroid biopsies. Thyroid Research. 2021;14(1):2.

https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/33568168 https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7874649 https://doi.org/10.1186/s13044-021-00093-2 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s13044-021-00093-2

Edens J, Chand M, Asghar I, Bhatt M, Anderson I, Miller S. Practical diagnostic utility of thyroid fine-needle aspiration cell blocks: Is always too much? J Am Soc Cytopathol. 2021;10(2):164–7. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/32978096 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jasc.2020.07.136 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jasc.2020.07.136

Knoepp SM, Roh MH. Ancillary techniques on direct-smear aspirate slides: a significant evolution for cytopathology techniques. Cancer Cytopathol. 2013;121(3):120-8. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/22786714 https://doi.org/10.1002/cncy.21214 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/cncy.21214

Saqi A. The state of cell blocks and ancillary testing: past, present, and future. Arch Pathol Lab Med. 2016;150(12):1318-22. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/27557411 https://doi.org/10.5858/arpa.2016-0125-RA DOI: https://doi.org/10.5858/arpa.2016-0125-RA

Downloads

Published

06/10/2025

How to Cite

Bisquera, N. A., Dampil, O. A., & Vista, B. D. (2025). Value of Cell Block Technique as an Adjunct to Smear Cytology in Thyroid Fine-Needle Aspiration Biopsy. The Philippine Journal of Pathology, 10(1), 9–16. https://doi.org/10.21141/PJP.2025.02

Issue

Section

Original Articles